Thursday, February 21, 2013
Dork Art: Mondo Celebrates The Oscars Again!
Similar to last year, Mondo will be launching three posters in conjunction with The Academy Awards. My favorite is the mesmerizing Laurent Durieux print for The Master. Stare into the abyss of Phillip Seymore Hoffman and it stares back - he's a Lovecraftian nightmare come to life! It measures 24 x 36 and will set you back $55. I'm guessing it will go on sale at some point during the Best Supporting Actor or Best Actor category Sunday night. Follow Twitter closely.
The Paranorman print is the work of the artist DKNG. It's limited to 245 copies and will run you $45. Glad to see Mondo endorsing what is clearly the best film in the Animated Feature category. Really got my fingers crossed for this Should-Be-Classic.
I most certainly cannot claim to be a fan of the film, but Olly Moss' Les Miserables print seems like a revelatory departure for the artist. Not your typical simplistic beauty, it has much more of an illustrative flair. ITMOD approved. 24 x 36 and running $50. I'm guessing it goes on sale during the Best Original Song category.
--Brad
The Oscars 2013 - Predictions & Desires
The Oscars are a joke. We all know this. But let's just set that aside - like we do every year. What I love about the Academy Awards is that it gives us a moment where we can just ramble on about movies with the regular people. You know, those nice folks out there that don't devote hours & hours upon a nerd blog, obsessing over every frame and hidden reference of the latest Quentin Tarantino flick. It's the Super Bowl of Cinema - and as is, they usually get all the nominations wrong and it's mostly just a fashion parade for US Weekly then it is an exploration of art. That being said, I think the nominations are much stronger than they have been in year's past which I find rather amusing since I felt that 2012 was one of cinema's weakest.
BEST PICTURE:
AMOUR
ARGO
BEASTS OF THE SOUTHERN WILD
DJANGO UNCHAINED
LES MISERABLES
LIFE OF PI
LINCOLN
SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK
ZERO DARK THIRTY
This is the second year in a row where my Favorite Film of the Year got a Best Picture nomination, but like last year, my pick doesn't have a chance in snowy hell of taking home the little gold guy. Django Unchained is not Quentin Tarantino's best film (that's Jackie Brown), but it is most certainly my favorite. The pacing is choppy; some claim the lack of editor Sally Menke is to blame, but I think Tarantino is just doing what he does best - elevation through mimicry. The Spaghetti Western is a genre defined through false starts & endings, and it's an aspect I cherish when done properly. Django pulls the rug from under you multiple times and what feels sloppy to some feels like perfection to me. We will never know what this film would look like if cut by Menke, but I genuinely feel like it wouldn't appear to be much different. But Django Unchained is the film with the least likely chance to win. It's genre, B Movie territory. Strike One. It's an extremely angry film. Not the revenge drama some make it out to be. This is not Kill Bill. It's a Campbellian Hero's Journey. The revenge aspect is on us, Django Unchained transforms the audience into Khan. Strike two. Finally, it's a Tarantino movie. He's the new Hitchcock and he'll never take home a statue. Strike three.
So, who gets it. There are only two films of the nine nominations that I absolutely destested: Life of Pi & Les Miserables. Their nominations are not surprising, especially when considering last year's Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, but Life of Pi is confusing mumbo jumbo & Les Miserables is a musical embarrassment. Lincoln is my second favorite flick in the pack, sharp tight narrative highlighted by an outstanding lead performance. Silver Linings Playbook is fun, sweet, romantic and a complete fantasy. Amour is a beast of emotion. No other film tortured me quite like that movie. Beasts of the Southern Wild is beautifully odd world building with a firm backbone supplied by a six year old actress. Zero Dark Thirty is CSI: Bin Laden. An intense procedural deepened by our own 9/11 memories. Argo seems to be the frontrunner at this point. Fascinating, given Ben Affleck's lack of nomination in the Best Director category. The last time a film took home Best Picture without even a director nomination was 1990's Driving Miss Daisy. Argo is a solid flick. I just don't love it. The first half is intense as hell, and I love all the Hollywood craziness but I just can't get behind the final ten minutes. The airport chase nonsense. Yes, both Lincoln & Zero Dark Thirty have they're way with history, but this feels the most Hollywoody. Still, far worse films have taken home the gold.
Prediction: Argo
Desire: Django Unchained
BEST DIRECTOR
BENH ZEITLIN (Beasts of the Southern Wild)
MICHAEL HANEKE (Amour)
STEVEN SPIELBERG (Lincoln)
DAVID O. RUSSELL (Silver Linings Playbook)
This is a tough category. I'm gonna immediately dismiss Ang Lee cuz as stated above, I hated his movie. But if I'm going to be fair it was fun to watch him play with technology - taking on James Cameron's 3D, David Fincher's digital zooms, and playfully experimenting in a similar fashion to his Hulk adaptation...and we all saw how well that went down (Screw it - I Love HULK!). Silver Linings Playbook is a lot of quirky fun, but I found David O Russell continues push-in closeups to be rather annoying. Steven Spielberg has an obvious mastery over his craft, but Lincoln's success mostly comes from Tony Kushner's screenplay and Daniel Day-Lewis' deep diving performance. Benh Zeitlin's Beasts of a Southern Wild has the feel of a young man's camera - eagerness mixed with blunt whimsy. He could be great someday, but he ain't there yet. Michael Haneke is a mad man. Sitting down to one of his films, you know your psyche is in danger. Whether he's documenting a home invasion (Funny Games), the hidden violence of a pre-WWI village (The White Ribbon), or the slow death of a loved one (Amour), Haneke has been accused of relishing in human horror. Maybe. But what impresses me so much about Amour is its claustrophobia. We're stuck in this tiny Parisian apartment. One character is slowly deteriorating in front of us. The other character is struggling to maintain his wife's last moments. Haneke never lets the room become tiresome. He finds new ways to shoot it, and concentrates the lens on the humanity of the structure. It's a daunting screenplay for a director to tackle, but Heneke as both writer & director was obviously up to the task.
The question becomes though, with Ben Affleck out of the running, where do the Academy voters cast their ballot? Zeitlen is too new to the game. Haneke's an outsider and in their eyes its enough that the film will most likely take home Best Foreign Film. Ang Lee certainly offers the visual feast and Life of Pi apes a lot of its praise from the novel's pre-owned enthusiasm. So could Spielberg take Oscar home? His last nomination was in 2007 for Munich, and he won in '99 for Saving Private Ryan & '94 for Schindler's List. No. I think Lincoln is not a significant enough departure from the Spielberg norm to land him back at the podium. David O Russell lost to Tom Hooper in 2011; I think we make up for that now. Silver Linings Playbook is not a showy picture, but neither was Hooper's The King's Speech, and performance can carry this category. Plus, Hollywood mogul Harvey Wienstein knows how capture Oscars via politics.
Prediction: David O. Russell
Desire: Michael Haneke
BEST ACTOR
BRADLEY COOPER (Silver Linings Playbook)
DANIEL DAY-LEWIS (Lincoln)
HUGH JACKMAN (Les Miserables)
JOAQUIN PHOENIX (The Master)
DENZEL WASHINGTON (Flight)
Well, lets just yank Hugh Jackman out of this category immediately. I thought he was atrocious. The man can sing, he's proven that before, but the man is no Jean Valjean. Especially when you have Colm Wilkinson, the real deal, putting him to shame in the Bishop cameo. I guess Denzel Washington does a decent job as the alcoholic cokehead pilot in Flight, but the movie is so run-of-the-mill that to grant him any acknowledgement would give Zemeckis' live action pap too much credit. Bradley Cooper has never been better than he is in Silver Linings Playbook, and I could see him winning if Harvey Weinstein manufactures a clean sweep for that movie. Definitely possible. I'd love to see Joaquin Phoenix take it; his turn as the sex starved madman in Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master is a masterpiece of anxiety, and makes Bradley Cooper's kooky nutjob look absolutely adorable. But there is no question who's taking home Oscar this Sunday. Daniel Day-Lewis puts in another one of his method absorption pieces as Abraham Lincoln. I appreciated his choice of accent, going for realism and dropping the iconic stature we're used to seeing on the five dollar bill. There is more humanity in his portrayal of Lincoln than we've yet experienced, he showcases the badass bravado we want from the great emancipator but I love the little moments with his bickering wife, and his war-thirsty son. And if we weren't allowed to give it to him for Bill The Butcher than we most certainly give it to him for the 16th president.
Prediction: Daniel Day-Lewis
Desire: Daniel Day-Lewis
BEST ACTRESS
JESSICA CHASTAIN (Zero Dark Thirty)
JENNIFER LAWRENCE (Silver Linings Playbook)
EMMANUELLE RIVA (Amour)
QUVENZHANE WALLIS (Beasts of the Southern Wild)
NAOMI WATTS (The Impossible)
This category is even tougher than Best Director. I don't know if you remember or care, but as 2012 was winding down and I had to put together my Dorkies, I could not list five female roles to save my life. Since then I've managed to watch all the above flicks and I think that each of these nominees turned in killer performances. As Hushpuppy, the adventurous orphan wandering the bayou wastelands of The Beasts of the Southern Wild, Quvenzhane Wallis delivers the most naturalistic realization. Jessica Chastain is all macho bravado, a little too on the nose, but solid. Naomi Watts is a tattered mess - flesh ripped, torn, and bleeding for nearly 90 minutes. Jennifer Lawrence is the It Girl of the moment, and as much as I was unimpressed with her previous nomination for Winter's Bone, her dullfaced turn in The Hunger Games, and her sourdough smirk in X-Men First Class, I have to admit that I was captivated by her mentally unbalanced love interest. And I think she might have this locked - and part of me wants to bet on all the Silver Linings Playbook nominations. But Sunday is also Emmanuelle Riva's 86th Birthday. Wouldn't it be a wonderful gift to win the big prize? And her slow decay on screen is pure Oscar bait gold. Utterly heartbreaking even if I think her partner, Jean-Louis Trintignant has the real winning role.
Prediction: Jennifer Lawrence
Desire: Emmanuelle Riva
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
ALAN ARKIN (Argo)
ROBERT DE NIRO (Silver Linings Playbook)
PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN (The Master)
TOMMY LEE JONES (Lincoln)
CHRISTOPH WALTZ (Django Unchained)
Why is Alan Arkin on this list? I mean, he did a fine job in Argo but there was absolutely nothing special about his character. A Best Actor nomination for Ben Affleck would make more sense. Robert De Niro is a lot of fun as the gambling addict father struggling to understand his son's crazy. He manages to be sympathetic one moment, and infuriatingly obtuse the next. It's been a long time since he's won the hearts of the Academy but I'm just not sure this role is showy enough to make them care again. Phillip Seymore Hoffman is the internet critic's pick. And he's darn good, but not a standout like his partner Joaquin. Christoph Waltz gets my vote. As the Obi Wan to Django's Luke Skywalker, King Schultz has all the happy mannerisms of the villainous Hans Landa (the role Waltz won for just a few years back) but pacts the film with warmth and understanding. The Landa/Schultz coin is a showcase for Waltz's incredible talent. Put him in every movie, I say. Tommy Lee Jones, though? He's grumpy, adorable, and powerful. He's a miserable old bastard of righteousness in Lincoln, and the emotional wallop of the climax is delivered through his character. I'd be perfectly happy to see him win.
Prediction: Tommy Lee Jones
Desire: Christoph Waltz
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
AMY ADAMS (The Master)
SALLY FIELD (Lincoln)
ANNE HATHAWAY (Les Miserables)
HELEN HUNT (The Sessions)
JACKI WEAVER (Silver Linings Playbook)
This is a less exciting race. Jacki Weaver is perfectly fine as the delicate wife to Robert De Niro's bull in a china shop. And it's lightyears away from the psychotic matriarch of Animal Kingdom, her previous nomination in 2011. Another loser from that year was Amy Adams (The Fighter), and she's going down this year as well. She's perfectly troubled as the wife of Hoffman's cult leader, but her best scene involves an epic handjob which of course makes it hard to showcase during the sizzle reel. Sally Field is good in Lincoln. But the character is a touch annoying. The tight focus of Lincoln's screenplay doesn't allow for Mary Todd showboating, but there are one or two moments in the film that might land her on top. I think Anne Hathaway is the winner though. She's the only good thing in Les Miserables, and her snotty/teary rendition of "I Dreamed A Dream" will get her the win. My pick, though, is Helen Hunt. The Sessions is the type of indie darling that stormed Hollywood during the early 90s, but despite its twee narrative centered around John Hawkes' quadriplegic virgin, I found myself suckered by its sweetness. And a lot of that has to do with her welcoming, forgiving, and accepting smile. Not to mention her sexual sincerity.
Prediction: Anne Hathaway
Desire: Helen Hunt
ANIMATED FEATURE
BRAVE
FRANKENWEENIE
PARANORMAN
THE PIRATES! BAND OF MISFITS
WRECK-IT-RALPH
There is no denying that Brave is a lesser Pixar. It's perfectly suitable, but the mother/daughter story is less interesting than the female empowerment quest that the trailer promised. The Pirates! Band of Misfits is a ton of fun. It's winky, jokey, and very British. Wreck-It-Ralph is gleeful, but I was kinda hoping for a Who Framed Roger Rabit reference-a-palooza and I found the Candyland setting a bit claustrophobic. Still, this seems to be the film that gets the most attention. Frankenweenie has no business here. It doesn't celebrate the oddity of youth, it mocks it. And Tim Burton just needs to take a break from filmmaking for a while. His ideas are played out. Old. Tired. Boring. Paranorman is everything that Burton was trying to do, but done successfully. It celebrates the strange of youth, it tells kids that it's your weird, unique talents that make you special. To ride ahead of the pack and not with the herd. And it's properly spooky the way Halloween stories should be.
Prediction: Wreck-It-Ralph
Desire: Paranorman
DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
5 BROKEN CAMERAS
THE GATEKEEPERS
HOW TO SURVIVE A PLAGUE
THE INVISIBLE WAR
SEARCHING FOR SUGAR MAN
As usual, the Best Documentary category is loaded with a lot of downers. In 5 Broken Cameras, a Palestinian farmer records the Israeli occupation of his backyard. Protests inevitably turn to violence. Friends & family loose their lives. The Invisible War is almost unfathomable with its nearly endless interviews of women raped while serving in the military. I never managed to catch The Gatekeepers. Can't comment on it. How To Survive A Plague left me a weeping mess. Following two bands of protest groups in late 80s New York while the Aids epidemic spread and politicians sat quiet. Searching For Sugar Man is the frothiest story depicting the mysterious rise of a Detroit castoff in the music scene of South Africa. While incredibly engaging it doesn't quite hold the terrifying punch of the other nominations. For it to win over How To Survive A Plague seems as insulting as Driving Miss Daisy taken the big prize from the nominationless Do The Right Thing.
Prediction: Searching For Sugar Man
Desire: How To Survive A Plague
CINEMATOGRAPHY
SEAMUS MCGARVEY (Anna Karenina)
RALPH RICHARDSON (Django Unchained)
CLAUDIO MIRANDA (Life of Pi)
JANUS KAMINSKI (Lincoln)
ROGER DEAKINS (Skyfall)
Based on the trailers, Anna Karenina sure does look artificially pretty. Spielberg's longtime collaborator Janus Kaminski knows how to fill a room full of light. I think Life of Pi has the most attention for its animated beauty, but how much of that is Miranda's skill and how much is it the FX company? Ralph Richardson would normally take home the glory for me and if this was Kill Bill in the hot seat than he most surly would. However, Roger Deakins delivers the most beautiful Bond film in the franchise, and with it he proves that digital photography is the future. Seriously, can you tell me that this does not look like film? No. The fiery Scottish moors. Shanghai's neon assassination. The gray windy skies of London. An absolutely stunning action film.
Prediction: Claudio Miranda
Desire: Roger Deakins
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
AMOUR (Michael Haneke)
DJANGO UNCHAINED (Quentin Tarantino)
FLIGHT (John Gatins)
MOONRISE KINGDOM (Wes Anderson & Roman Coppola)
ZERO DARK THIRTY (Mark Boal)
I won't drone on and on here. You already read my Django Unchained rant. I still feel it. And I'm fighting myself from diving back into the theater for a fourth go around, the blu ray will be here soon. I thought Flight was barely above an After School Special. Amour is more about the performances than the screenplay, but the life brought into that tiny apartment started here on the page. I'm happy to see Moonrise Kingdom get some love, but no one really seems to care. I loved it. But compared to previous efforts I think it's lesser Anderson. Zero Dark Thirty is not going to be taking home any of the top awards, so if the Academy wants to throw it a bone it'll happen here.
Prediction: Zero Dark Thirty
Desire: Django Unchained
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
ARGO (Chris Terrio)
BEASTS OF THE SOUTHERN WILD (Lucy Alibar & Benh Zeitlin)
LIFE OF PI (David Magee)
LINCOLN (Tony Kushner)
SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK (David O. Russell)
Another tough selection. Argo will take home the Best Picture, but as stated above, I felt that the screenplay took one too many liberties with the event. Life of Pi might nab this with its confounding, muddy morals. No one has read the source material for Beasts of the Southern Wild, so that's out. Silver Linings Playbook might have a shot, but I think it suffers the same problems as Beasts. Lincoln is the obvious winner here. Adapting Doris Kerns Goodwins' Team of Rivals was a beastly challenge, but Tony Kushner's choice to focus solely on the passing of 13th amendment was inspired. Taking what could have been another blathering, sweeping biopic and transforming it into a taught, political thriller. In that one month of January you get all the greatness & humanity of Lincoln boiled down to its essence.
Prediction: Lincoln
Desire: Lincoln
Olly Moss' 85 Years of Oscars
--Brad
Book Review: The Vertical Farm
My non-fiction reading of late has mostly been in the realms of history or philosophy. It’s been a while since I read a science book, and I think I was starting to feel the absence. So, I grabbed The Vertical Farm off my shelf and jumped in. It’s a crazy seeming idea. Or is it? Build skyscraper farms in the hearts of our urban centers. Why not. We need food. We need jobs. We need somewhere for our waste to go. We need new ways of feeding the massive numbers of people on our planet. Why not build up? Is everything Dr. Despommier suggests possible? Will it all work? Maybe. Maybe not. He comes right out on multiple occasions and says that he doesn’t have all the answers. What he and his grad students came up with are a bunch of ideas which seem like they might work. They’ll take effort, money, expertise, etc. to put into practice. But what he proposes doesn’t seem to be outside of our current technological or resource reach. He’s not proposing something that relies on an assumed advancement that may or may not show up in the next few years. The primary stumbling block for this sort of project seems to be will. Are people willing to do it?
There really does seem to be potential for indoor farming, built within city limits. The ability to control crops, to grow them clean, to reduce water use, waste, and soil depletion. The potential ability to recycle waste and water, creating clean water. The ability to reduce the agricultural footprint on the land, one of the largest sources of a multitude of pollutants. And the potential to create a great many jobs in the places people want to be (cities). Not to mention reducing the vulnerability of our food sources by decentralizing them and securing them inside, and the reduction in fuel consumption and wasted food that goes into getting harvests across vast distances to the people’s plate. The potential benefits are quite astounding, and the potential problems, while not negligible, do not seem insurmountable. But again, it comes down to will. When you have a large part of the population of what was once one of the most advanced cultures on the planet claiming that the environment is perfectly fine and that nothing we do can really damage it, in spite of incalculable amounts of evidence (and common sense) to the contrary, simply because their sports team (I mean political party) tells them that’s what they should think, I don’t have the greatest faith that the will to lead the world in technology and culture is in the heart Americans anymore. I hope I’m wrong. And I know there are plenty of us out there who genuinely think things can be fixed, made better, and advanced again. If only the petty tribalism and superstition can be cast off, there’s no telling what we could do.
In this book, Dr. Despommier sells his heart out on this idea. He clearly believes in it, believes it can lead the way to better, healthier, and more sustainable food production for all the world’s people, even the several billion expected in the next couple decades. But he admits, it’s an idea. It needs to be tested, tried, explored. There will likely be problems he and his people have not foreseen, but there may also be additional benefits, new options and possibilities opened by experimenting. What is sure is that we need to eat. Traditional farming can not sustain our current numbers for long, and can not sustain our expected numbers at all. Pollution levels are building up to potentially catastrophic levels. And one day soon, something will change. Instead of waiting for that to happen, and then suffering the consequences, he proposes we meet that change on our own terms, direct the way things go in a more thoughtful and logical way. Nature is amazingly resilient. As he points out, there are numerous instances where, once left alone, nature has repaired itself in much quicker order than people expected (the Dust Bowl’s rebirth, forests in the North East US, etc.). But the key is leaving nature alone to fix itself. That means more self-sustaining (so called ‘green’) cities. Better public transit, better food distribution, better resource management, etc. (I always find it funny that so called ‘conservatives’ are the most liberal about wasting resources. Every old-timey person knows you don’t shit where you eat [pollution], and you don’t waste what you don’t use). It means an end to farming techniques that have been used and abused since we first stopped roaming the grasslands. It means learning from our mistakes and doing it better. And it means finally admitting that we’re taking a hand in the shaping of ourselves and our world, and we should act accordingly.
It may be up to more forward thinking, or more wealthy and experimental nations to break this new ground. Though that saddens me, like space exploration, I’ll take what I can get. If it’s Dubai, Germany, or China, someone’s going to need to do something soon. I wish it would be the United States. Fifty or sixty years ago, before the religious right’s devastating war on science and reason, it would have been. But now science is feared, facts ignored, and ignorance is celebrated as a virtue (it even has its own genre of music, sinisterly called Country). No wonder we have one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world. When a sizable portion of the population not only believes in, but looks forward to an apocalyptic ending of the world (they can keep looking forward to it until the Sun finally expands in another what, six billion years?), how can you get them to plan for the future and for future generations? But again, like with space, someone else doing it is better than it not getting done at all. I want to be proud of American advancement in science, technology, and exploration. But I’ll accept being proud of human advancement in all three.
The book, in its conversational tone, is meant as a discussion starter. He isn’t giving all the answers, but posing open ended questions. He isn’t saying, “this is THE answer.” He’s saying, “this might be AN answer, let’s give it a try, or come up with something better.” He doesn’t ignore the idea of profit, or of our less than altruistic motivations, nor does he condemn them. We are the creatures we’ve evolved to be, and part of that is our hunger for more. As is being learned more and more, doing things for the greater good of all does not mean giving up personal gain. Quality of life today and in the future should be important to all of us. This book is a call to action, to fix or let nature fix, the mistakes of our past, and to learn from them. It’s time to change the way we farm. Time to change the way we feed ourselves and others. Time to stop being a slave to the whims of the environment, and time to stop being an agent of destruction in that environment. There is plenty of room on this Earth (and possibly on countless other worlds), and we have the tools to live together. We only lack the willingness to do it. Read the book for a boost of hope and for some ideas. It’s a starting point, not a finish.
The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century
Author: Dr. Dickson Despommier
Publisher: Thomas Dunne Books
ISBN: 978-0-312-61139-2
-Matt
Comic Review: Batgirl Volume 2
Volume 1 of Batgirl was one of those big surprises, because it was pretty good. Still more of what I expect from DC than Batwoman’s more EC Comics vibe, it wasn’t ultra-silly. And the way each villain reflected an aspect of her own character made things interesting. This second volume builds on the first pretty well, pitting her against Grotesque, who isn’t a reflection of her, so much as a collector looking for a prize. But the story does force her to finally confront the last barrier of her recovery, as she faces one of the men who was with the Joker the night she was paralyzed. With that final confrontation and catharsis, Barbara Gordon and her alter ego Batgirl are finally ready to step back into the ring and become a crime fighter Gotham needs. That brings us to the second major villain of this volume, and what appears to be the major conflict being set up for the series, Knightfall. And there’s the reappearance of Barbara’s brother James, who apparently has a storied career in the pages of DC comics, of which I was unaware until recently. Looks like he’s going to be involved in some serious trouble coming up, too.
There’s lots of action, plenty of fist fights, and henchmen bashing. The art is fine, if not especially memorable. And Gail Simone does a passable job writing, seeming to have toned down a bit of the false-hipness of the first volume. Batgirl’s running commentary is still somewhat distracting and often contains the more groan-worthy bits of dialog. But it’s not too bad. The brief aside to deal with the Night of Owls multi-title event was distracting, especially since it doesn’t seem to effect anything else in the series. But that’s kind of the problem with cross-over events. I guess the big breakout at Arkham Asylum (which isn’t really talked about in that Night of Owls issue, but that I know about because of reading some of the other series) does cast a shadow over things. Still.
Unlike Batwoman, which had such a dramatic shift in art style, and I would hazard quality, between volume 1 and volume 2 (so much so that I gave up on the series), this feels like a natural progression from the first volume. And if you enjoyed the first volume, you should enjoy this one, too. From those I’ve read, it seems to be one of the better of the New 52 lineup. Not amazing. Not a ‘must read.’ But if you’re looking for a Bat title that doesn’t suck, check it out.
Batgirl: Volume 2 Knightfall Descends
Author: Gail Simone
Artists: Adrian Syaf, etc.
Publisher: DC Comics
ISBN: 978-1-4012-3816-2
-Matt
Comic Reviews: The Walking Dead 1&2
Volume 1
15 years ago, zombies were the black sheep of the horror world. You typically had to raid the video rental shelves for Italian movies from the 70s to see anything you hadn’t already seen a dozen times. The list of really good subgenre films could be counted on two hands, and that was including some fringe titles like Dead Heat. Fast forward to today, and frankly, the walking dead are kind of played out. Too many movies, too many comics, too many TV shows. More important, too many bad ones. Still, when it first hit the stands, The Walking Dead was a breath of fresh…well, it was welcome. The series was everything this zombie starved fan was hungry for. Like the author, I had always wanted to follow the characters (those few who might survive) after the credits began to roll. What happened to those folks on the helicopter at the end of Dawn of the Dead? What was up with that island in Day of the Dead? What happened to New York City after Zombie? What would have happened to the badass reporter in Nightmare City (among other names) if he wasn’t hooked up with that idiot woman who kept complaining that everyone deserved it? Would he have found more explosive TVs to throw? Well, that’s what this comic was created to explore; the ‘and then…?’ factor. Awesome.
Re-reading the first trade all these years later, I totally see what I saw in it at that time, though to tell the truth, it’s not that great. That said, the ending is awesome, and from what I understand, that amazing moment is totally botched in the TV series, which is too bad. It’s a defining moment in the comic, and should have been in the show as well. It’s also weird reading it, and remembering all these characters I know won’t make it very far. I forgot about that couple and their kids. I forgot one dude even had a kid (shows how long she makes it). I know there’s a lot of nasty death on its way. Unlike many later story arcs, much of the death in this one is caused by the undead. What makes the comic work is what makes the best zombie movies work, the drama of people in a horrible situation. Zombies are like a natural disaster. They don’t have a plan, they don’t have a goal, they’re not evil, they don’t want to hurt you. They just feed on whatever is in front of them, moving without thought for self or for the future. It is this relentless, mindless danger that makes them far more spirit crushing than many classic monsters and villains. You can kill a dozen, a hundred, but there are always more, always coming, always lurking, like living under constant threat of bombing. You just never know when or where, only that eventually, they will strike.
The Walking Dead Volume 1: Days Gone By
Author: Robert Kirkman
Artist: Tony Moore
Publisher: Image
ISBN: 978-1-58240-358-8
Volume 2
Starting with a not too surprising revelation, the story picks up with the aftermath of the disastrous attack on the camp. Our survivors must move away from Atlanta if they are to avoid the city’s roving hoards. They meet up with new folk, run afoul of a dumbass with a gun, and find sanctuary…maybe. The harshness of survival and the fragility of life are forefront. And we’re still at the point in the series where the zombies seem like the real enemy. There are hints of the human ugliness to come, but on the smallest of scales so far. And we see the first real cracks in Rick’s armor, which author Kirkman will spend the rest of the series (as far as I’ve read) systematically destroying. The relationships that form are interesting, as people try so hard to get a little happiness and human connection.
I’m getting a little of that feeling I had when first reading this series all those years ago, before zombies were so overplayed in books, comics, and movies. This really is the series I dreamed of in the 90s, when I was consuming every zombie thing I could get my hands on (what little there was). This is the kind of thing I wanted to do in a roleplaying game, when I still regularly played. The ongoing story of survival in a world gone so horribly wrong. And by volume 2, it feels like Kirkman is getting a better handle on things, on how the story will go and how the characters will interact. Plus, there’s that last couple of pages, that set up the multi-volume arc that is about to begin. That’s when the real horror, the human horror will become more obvious, when the zombies become what they’re best at being, the quiet, menacing threat that lurks in the shadows. And when the real villains of the series step forward.
The Walking Dead: Volume 2: Miles Behind Us
Author: Robert Kirkman
Artist: Charlie Adlard
Publisher: Image
ISBN: 978-1-58240-413-4
-Matt
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
"I Don't Know How To Be Dead!" - Wesley Snipes Battles The Undead (Again) in GallowWalkers!
I'm sure this is going to be terrible. But Wesley Snipes looks all kinds of crazy/beautiful in this Horror Western - that gray beard! And I'm always craving this kinda genre mashing. Maybe, just maybe, it will be a winner like The Burrowers. Still...that's doubtful. Our best hope for this flick is that it's an entertaining wreck of B Movie trash. But you know yer gonna give it a whirl.
--Brad
Dork Art: Dan Mumford's The Wicker Man
Dark City Gallery is launching a British Cinema series tomorrow with this beautiful Dan Mumford print of the original Wicker Man. One of my favorite bizarro flicks that's never really had a great illustration presentation - until now. It measures 24 x 36 and will set you back 40 pounds, what's that in dollars? I don't know - I'm 'merican. But it seems like the right price to put this beauty on your wall.
--Brad
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

































