Showing posts with label Wrath of Khan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wrath of Khan. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Dork Art: Paul Shipper's Khan + Honest Trailer


Paul Shipper is quickly becoming one of my favorite Dork Artists.  The man has a picture perfect style reminiscent of Drew Struzan, and I can only dream that his illustrations becomes the new standard for movie posters.  Sigh.  At the very least, comic publisher IDW is taking notice, as they've brought him on to do cover work for their October Khan miniseries.  Never mind the fact that the White Khan makes no sense within the context of the reboot/sequel, or the fact that IDW has already done a Khan miniseries detailing the dictator's rise to power.


While we're at it let's also ignore the fact that IDW's Star Trek comics are at best mediocre.  And I'm sure you're not at all interested in another anti-Star Trek Into Darkness rant from me.  Let's just be happy with some pretty artwork, and I'll let the good folks over at Honest Trailers rip Abrams a new one.  Seriously, the below trailer sums up all of Into Darkness's problems better than a million angry blog rants.  Have a laugh and give a watch.


--Brad

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Movie Review: Star Trek


    I don’t remember when I first heard about this project.  But I know it was during one of the very deep low points in Trek fandom.  Enterprise had been canceled (the first Trek show to meet that fate since the original).  Nemesis had been a bomb (the first film to not make its money back in theaters) at the box office and with this viewer.  Voyager still haunted the psyche with its deep shadow of raw suck.  And science fiction in general (not to mention the viewing public) seemed to have moved on.  Then the guy behind Lost says he wants to do Star Trek?  Is he high?  Nobody is gonna want to see that.  Those few people who still lay claim to the name Trekkie aren’t going to climb out of their Mountain Dew and pizza stained computer chair, away from their internet chat board where they’ve just proved to some 8 year old kid that they know more about what a Klingon likes to do on vacation, to pay 10 bucks for a ticket and see a Trek film made by some mainstream guy who has several successes to his name.  Especially not one about Kirk.  How could they be so stupid as to not do a (insert ridiculously obscure character only a dozen people remember and could never sustain a solo project) movie?!  Fools!


    Recasting iconic characters.  That’s tough.  Look at how people reacted to Daniel Craig playing James Bond, and based only on his hair color.  And that’s a character from a book who had already been played by at least 7 actors (5 in the official series).  Right off the bat, everyone is complaining about the casting of ‘children’ to play Kirk and crew.  Of course, the fact that Chris Pine was only a couple years younger than Shatner (and playing 5 or so years younger) when the original show started, or that John Cho was much older than the original Sulu, or that only two of the cast hadn’t yet reached their 30s didn’t sway anyone.  Pine didn’t look like Shatner looked in Wrath of Khan, therefore was far too young!  Internet chat rooms were full of naysayers saying nay.  As with my Star Wars love (and most other love), my Trek love was always strong, but filled with glaring gaps I simply chose not to acknowledge.  Voyager?  Didn’t happen.  Hugh and the neutering of the Borg?  Didn’t happen.  Season three of Enterprise?  Didn’t happen.  (Episodes 2 & 3 of Star Wars?  F no.  Never heard of them.).  But this movie happened.  I have no problem with original timeline Spock traveling back in time and sparking this alternate history.  It’s hardly the first to appear in Trek.


    Like the best Trek films, this movie has a great deal of enjoyable character interaction.  Sure, it’s a bit weird, because they set Kirk and Spock up as rivals.  But otherwise, certain rhythms fall into place.  And each cast member gets his or her time to shine.  Each one has a job and gets to do it.  The use of Christopher Pike as a mentor for Kirk is interesting (his own life-path altered in this reality).  And the destruction of an entire world lets you know that they mean business and that this really is a different timeline.  Anything can happen and the future is up for grabs.  I like that.


    Now, the film is not perfect.  Hardly.  It features some of those irritating things Trek is known for.  Constant preaching about the rules followed immediately by characters throwing them out.  Also, I’m fairly sure that military command isn’t just handed off to whomsoever one wills, nor do people who stow away get promoted to second in command because they‘re hanging around.  I was waiting for the bridge to be left in the hands of the delivery guy who happened to be standing in the corner (‘Hey, UPS guy!  You have the bridge!’).  And the overall conflict of this movie, like nearly every Trek film, is basically a retelling of Wrath of Khan.  Sigh.  Strange new worlds?  New civilizations?  Nope.  We’ve got revenge obsessed thugs to punch into submission.  Boldly going where Trek has gone again and again for the last 30 years (thanks Ben).

Khaaaaaan!  I mean, Nerooooooo!

    But while not perfect, it is a perfectly entertaining movie.  It follows my golden rule for Trek movies.  “First make a good movie; second make a good Trek movie.”  It remains largely true to Star Trek’s overall context while understanding that it is not 1967, 1987, or 1997 anymore (ever notice how Enterprise feels like it was made by the same people in the same way as Next Gen, how there was no maturation of style or technique in 20 years of televised Trek?  I did.).  Now, you might think I just mean that it’s effects were upgraded or that they cut more often.  I don’t.  Though those things are true.  But it has a tightness and purpose that has been missing for a long time.  Not to mention that all important sense of fun.  My hope when I walked out of the theater was that from this seed of a new beginning, we could see some really interesting chances taken, new paths for classic characters forged.  Alas, that is not what happened.  But taking the 2009 film by itself, the potential it represents for Trek’s reinvention is enormous, breaking the stagnant cage it had been locked in for so long.  Here’s hoping Into Darkness proves to be a stumble (V, Generations, Nemesis) the series can easily get past with a quality follow-up.  And I agree with co-Dork Brad that to see what I really want in Star Trek probably requires a television series.  I just hope that a new Trek show would learn the lessons of the last decade.  Short, intense, well produced seasons, without filler (see: Rome, Mad Men, The Shield, etc. for examples).  But in the meantime, this film helped put Trek back in the cultural consciousness like it hadn’t been since the height of Next Gen’s popularity in the early 90s.  So, I tip my hat.



-Matt


Friday, May 17, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness - The Spoiler Filled Review!


"You should have let me sleep."  Damn right.  The writers should have listened to their own dialog.  There are a lot of stops along the road to failure, but Star Trek Into Darkness was doomed from the moment that 1979's Star Trek - The Motion Picture was deemed a box office disappointment (despite being the highest grossing film in the franchise till 2009's relaunch - way to go Paramount finance) and director Nick Meyer was brought on board to retool a slash & burned Wrath of Khan.  As is with most Trekkies, Star Trek II is my absolute favorite voyage for the USS Enterprise.  But it's a film that has infected every sequel since its success - it took the cowboy franchise of intergalactic westward expansion and transformed it into a versus punch 'em up actioner.  Almost every Trek film attempts, with varying degrees of success, to pit its Captain against a Khan substitute.  Part III has Christopher Lloyd's Klingon Krug.  Part V has the hippy dippy half brother Sybock.  VI has Kirk's mirror racist General Chang.  Generations has the ribbon runner Dr. Sauron.  First Contact has The Borg.  Insurrection has the stretchmark disaster Ru'afo.  Nemesis has Tom Hardy's heinous Picard clone, Shinzon.  And the 2009 prequel/sequel has the mad time warped Romulan, Nero.  Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan.  Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!  So, no surprises here, Into Darkness is about Khan.  No matter how hard or loud the Abrams camp sidestepped the villain question, I don't think there was a Trekkie out there who didn't think this new film was going to address Star Trek's most iconic big bad.  As much as I hoped for a new direction, or a start to that 5 Year Mission, Abrams & his writing team just couldn't resist a crack at the superman.


But let's put that disappointment to the side.  Dismiss it as Trekkie wishful thinking.  We've been fed Khan for thirty years why should we expect a new flavor?  Let's even shake off JJ Abrams' despotic grip on his mystery box & how the John Harrison subterfuge was totally for not and probably robbed the film from any real tension.  We'll also kick aside the fact that the Khan seen Into Darkness is absolutely not the Khan seen in the Original Series episode "Space Seed" or Star Trek II.  We haven't progressed at all since the 1960s, so let's enjoy the continued whitewashing of characters and accept Khan Noonien Singh as the name a growly, pale brit.  Nitpicks, right?  Sure.  Whatever.

Why don't we just erase the Trek canon and look at Into Darkness as the sequel to 2009's Star Trek.  Wait - we can't!  JJ Abrams is attempting to eat his cake and have it too.  And for a moment there I thought he could make it work.  The brilliance of the 09 film is that it neatly acts as a sequel to the other films while also revamping the series for a new generation.  Nero's attack on the USS Kelvin sets into motion a new series of adventures for Kirk & company; there is a familiarity to the events, but the characters are now free to live new stories.  Vulcan is gone.  Bam.  That was a helluva statement.  Chris Pine's snot-nosed, Starfleet brat learns the challenges of command & how to balance his gut with the Captain's seat.  Star Trek was dead in the land of both TV & Cinema, and JJ brought the great beast back to life.  I am thankful for that.


But it's obvious from Into Darkness that JJ Abrams, who has made a career out of revitalizing the cold corpses of much beloved product, cares very little or at least has no understanding for his subject.  He starts his sequel with a Raiders of the Lost Ark temple footchase that sees Kirk shatter the Prime Directive in an attempt to save a race of primitives as well as Spock's life.  It's an opportunity to showcase Kirk's individuality as well as a means to shoehorn in Star Trek II's "The Needs of the Many" morality.  A return to San Francisco sees Admiral Pike strip Kirk of his command, and reclaim the Enterprise.  Another possibly interesting departure for this crew....it last about five minutes.  Khan Godfather III's a Starfleet boardroom, killing the potential of Pike, and thrusting Kirk on his revenge fueled plot.

Four years ago we spent an entire film maneuvering Captain Kirk into the chair.  Chris Pine's interpretation of the character was a snot-nosed drifter; a genius with no place in the world until Pike pulled him off the barroom floor and dropped him into the Academy.  When Pike was kidnapped by Nero, Kirk had to learn to play with others if he was going to live up to the legend that was his father.  And now, in Into Darkness, we get to do it all over again.  The punk is still not worthy of the chair and halfway through the film he even tells Spock that he has no idea what he's doing, and the pointy eared bastard should take the seat instead  Of course, this is setting up the reversal climax, The Death of Kirk.


A nearly beat for beat remake of Wrath of Khan's conclusion.  Why?  The script is constantly relying on the films of yesteryear.  We're supposed to understand that Kirk & Spock are BFFs despite the fact that in this timeline they've only known each other for a little over a year, and are constantly battling over procedure.  In the last film, Leonard Nimoy's Spock tells Quinto's Spock that they need each, but I don't think Quinto's Spock has seen the light yet, and Pine's Kirk certainly can't stand the green blooded hobgoblin.  And you think that when I hear the line "Ship...out of danger" I'm gonna get all teary eyed?  And after Kirk's last breath escapes we get Spock's ridiculous theft of "KHAAAAAAN!" and I'll be moved to heart pumping angry action?  No.  It pulled me right out of the film.  Those are the cheats of the lamest of remakes, Into Darkness coasts on your memories of these characters even when the scipt butchers their personalities.

Throughout this film Captain Kirk is scared, clueless, and sorry.  Abrams is in love with the idea of a reckless adventurer, but Captain Kirk is not Indiana Jones.  Where is the brilliant strategist?  Where are those coded moments in which Kirk & Spock pull the wool over Khan's eyes, trading blow for blow in submarine combat?  Here we just get one rushed action set piece leading into the other - Kirk barreling down the hallways, aching to bloody his fists on superman's chin.  


Then you've got the Nimoy cameo.  The very notion that Young Spock must speed dial Old Spock for a history lesson is absurd.  The film already takes two seconds to tell you that Khan is 300 years old and a war criminal, but Young Spock still needs to be told by Old Spock that Khan was the Enterprise's greatest enemy?  Uh, no he wasn't?  Iconic as all hell, sure.  But that phallic whale Probe from The Voyage Home was a larger threat.  Khan was an old angry guy we dumped on a planet decades ago - a man who stole a ship from the Federation and sucker punched the Enterprise.  The reason Wrath of Khan is badass is because it's a personal attack birthed from Kirk's knowitall god complex.

But why does Khan even need to be the bad guy for Into Darkness?  We've already got Admiral George W Bush - I mean, Admiral Marcus marching to war with the Klingons.  When the film briefly teams up with Khan as a means to take down the Section 31 conspiracy, I thought we might be venturing into some new territory.  One of the great bits about the original "Space Seed" episode is that Khan has a point.  Maybe in this new timeline Khan can also find a place?  But no, we gotta manufacture some Khan rage cuz Khan was angry before and he's always gotta be angry.  Just dumb.


If I'm digging a movie I can forgive a lot of plot holes.  I can get pumped by The Avengers or depressed by The Dark Knight Rises, and ignore all the holes to drive my mac truck through.  Every big time Hollywood movie (including all Trek) is going to have some serious head scratchers.  But Into Darkness is nothing but confused, half assed screenwriting.  And worst of all is that it preys on my love for the films that came before and it doesn't do any of the heavy lifting on its own.  It drops Carol Marcus into the action, giving her no reason to be there other than to show off her rack.  A brilliant scientist reduced to a pair of panties.  The conversation of "Space Seed" is whittled down into high jumps and a few fist fights.  We get Klingons cuz Trek has Klingons.  Kirk is killed cuz someone's gotta die.  And Kirk is revived cuz we can't not have Kirk..........I mean, you don't even have the balls to wait one movie to resurrect your champion!?!?  And why do you need Khan blood when you have the blood of 72 other supermen in your cargo bay???  What the hell?  DAMMMMIT!


Obviously, I love Star Trek.  And I don't want to come off as another troll hating on the Internet.  And if I squint really hard I can find a couple of things that I liked about Into Darkness - Bruce Greenwood's sideburns,  Karl Urban's neverending metaphors, those Klingon helmets.  But I was just deeply pained by the sequel we got here.  It's a dolt.  But the franchise has survived terrible movies before and it will survive this bland monster.  And hopefully it will make a crap ton of cash cuz I want another movie.

Star Trek Into Darkness ends with The Enterprise finally launching it's Five Year Mission (where this film should have started).  And now that JJ Abrams is off to play in the Lucasfilm sandbox, maybe he can take his trilogy of screenwriters with him and hand Star Trek to a real fan...or at least someone who understands the excitement of exploration.  I'll let you throw in another Khan if you want to, but give us some Alien worlds, some ideas, some actual Trek amongst the Stars.


--Brad

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Movie Review: Star Trek First Contact



    I’m not just a contrarian when I say that Wrath of Khan (generally considered the best of the franchise) is not my favorite.  This movie is.  Though the argument could certainly be made that First Contact is the Next Gen cast’s Wrath of Khan.  If Khan is Kirk’s great nemesis (I would argue he isn’t, but…) then the Borg is/are certainly Picard’s, and here he battles them on operatic, cinematic proportions.  But unlike Wrath of Khan, there’s actually a lot going on here, including time travel, the first warp-ship launch, a Borg invasion, and the temptation of Data.


    Unlike the weak and silly Generations, this film takes the cast of The Next Generation into a real cinematic adventure.  It’s grand in scope, dramatic, funny, scary, action packed, and with some really top notch guest actors, yet still plenty of time for the main cast to get their moments in the sun.  And I think it manages to get at the heart of Star Trek, the heart of Next Gen especially, and the heart of the Borg.  Like the best of the original cast movies, this features a strong relationship between the crew, especially Picard and Data, with some early hints of the triangle that would include Worf.  It made the Borg scary and alien again.  I reject the idea that the so called Borg Queen made them too human.  In fact, I’d say it made them even more alien.  As she warns, you’re thinking too three dimensionally.  She isn’t a being, not a single thing or even a program, not a leader; she is a personification of the essence of a species.  The Borg is a collective, a mass mind; she is an aspect of that mass mind.  As my face is not me, only what you see of me, she is the face of the Borg.  And the malevolent, invasive sexuality she oozes reminds you that on an interstellar/civilization scale, the Borg are like rapists, forcibly blending with those they find, and taking everything from them.  But they are also the dark reflection of ourselves, the worst case scenario view of what we could become, the ultimate consumers who have abused technology to the point that they’ve become monsters.  Unlike so many straight-up anti-science messages in the Trek films, the Borg still feel like a warning, not a condemnation.


    The look of the film is impressive, with good effects, excellent costumes and set design, and good cinematography.  The acting is great.  James Cromwell manages to inject uncomfortable amounts of humanity into his Federation hero.  So often, when you look at the lives of famous people (explorers, presidents, etc.) they seem like one dimensional characters.  But the reality is they were people, like anyone else.  Gandhi was a racist.  Richard Francis Burton liked to bone.  Hitler liked Disney films.  I like that Zefram Cochrane was  a genius inventor motivated by making a buck and retiring to a tropical island, not some staid, stiff upper lip historic caricature.  Patrick Stewart gets to Shakespeare the hell out of half this movie, spitting out lines from Moby Dick, hissing insults, and bellowing rage.  His normal cool is broken by the memories of what the Borg did to him, what they represent.  Like a 70s exploitation film, he’s a rape victim on a quest for revenge, the bloodier the better.  But this is Trek, and Picard is the ultimate Trek hero, curious, honorable, intelligent, compassionate, and ultimately just.  I can’t really talk about the actors in this film without giving a special shout-out to Alice Krige, who has that same devil-woman magic Lena Olin has.  Even under all that latex and Vaseline, with her voice alone she can worm her way into my brain and make me do things.  Were I in Data’s place, I know the choice I’d have made.  She delivers all the menace and allure of a classic femme fatale, giving the Borg a gut-level terror they hadn’t possessed since the introduction of that blasted Hugh (CURSE YOU, HUGH!!!).


    Like the best Trek movies before (Wrath of Khan and The Voyage Home), First Contact is a completely watchable film, even if you’ve never watched an episode of the show.  Sure, some things won’t have the emotional resonance, but a new viewer shouldn’t be lost.  It’s like I’ve said on numerous occasions, first make it a good movie, second make it a good Trek movie.  For an example of what not to do, Star Trek V is a good Trek movie, but a bad movie.  It’s heart is in the right place, but nothing else is.  I’ve made this argument before, too.  First Contact should have been the first Next Gen cast movie.  Generations, besides being a crappy movie, acted as a ‘send-off’ by the original cast for the new cast.  But Picard and crew had already enjoyed seven seasons (that’s four more than the originals).  They didn’t need a send-off.  First Contact is a much stronger start.  And, I would further argue that the next film should have been an alternate universe story (with them traveling back to the wrong timeline at the end of First Contact), possibly some sort of Mirror Universe tale.  With their third movie being something along the lines of Insurrection, a light hearted and fun story.  This could have echoed the trilogy within the original cast films (II, III, and IV), and given a much better arc for the Next Gen crew.  Also, Data should have died at the end of First Contact.  Totally.  None of that B4 BS.  In the aftermath of the loss of Data, perhaps a triangle of Picard, Worf, and Riker (or Crusher) could have been forged.  Anyway, that’s all hindsight complaints.  The movies are what they are, and Generations and Nemesis exist.  Nothing I can do about that now.  But at least the Next Gen cast, like Pierce Brosnan as Bond, got two good movies.



-Matt


Eat it, Ensign Lynch!

Monday, April 22, 2013

Movie Review: Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan



    Probably still the most popular Star Trek film, rivaled only by the 2009 re-launch, The Wrath of Khan is a mixed bag for me.  On the one hand, I love Khan and that it is a direct tie-in to the original series.  On the other hand, this was the movie that turned the series Star Trek into an action movie franchise and away from any semblance of cultural or galactic exploration.  Not that the original show was the ‘thoughtful’ science fiction show some fans claim.  But it occasionally made the attempt, and with the exception of the horrid failure that was Star Trek V, the films never made the attempt again.


    The story is very simple.  A Federation ship accidentally stumbles upon Khan, last seen marooned on a planet by Kirk many years before.  He takes over that ship and goes on a rampage, going after a new scientific development, the Genesis Devise.  Of course, The Enterprise is miraculously the only ship anywhere nearby and is tasked with going to stop him.  And, through monstrous coincidence, the Genesis Devise was created by one of Kirk’s former lovers and their child.  A battle ensues.  The end.  That’s really it.  It’s only slightly more complicated than the story of The Motion Picture, which is about as linier as possible.  The effects are good, the production design excellent, and the score is great.  In fact, though James Horner seems to have a fairly limited range, often lifting from his own previous work for new films, I think this may be the single best Star Trek score.  Technically and visually, this is probably the best of the original cast films.  It also expands on the enjoyable bit of character banter between Kirk and McCoy (and Spock to a degree) in the first film, by giving the characters a lot more interaction, getting humor and humanity into the characters.  The show had a lot of it, and it was nice to have it in the film.  In fact, the bits between the main cast would go on to be the best part of the rest of the series, getting the viewer through even the craptastic Star Trek V.


    There are several inconsistencies here.  The obvious one that many have pointed out is that Chekov was not in Space Seed; he wasn’t even on the show during the same season.  OK.  Fine.  Maybe he was there and we didn’t see him?  Whatever.  But what actually does bother me is Khan’s people.  On the original show, he had a crew of very ethnically diverse genetic super-humans.  And they were all about his age.  Now, all his people are Aryan wet dreams, and look to be in their early 20s.  What gives?  It feels like the easy way out, making them too obviously connected to Nazi myth ideology.  And this makes it easy for challenging questions about Khan’s morality and potential to be completely ignored.  Again, focusing on blowing stuff up instead of thinking about it.  Personal difficulties aside, including hindsight evaluation of the films that would follow, it is a rousing adventure movie with plenty of thrills.  The regular cast members put on good performances, though a few of them get shorted on screentime (Uhura and Sulu hardly present at all).  And Ricardo Montalban is a powerhouse.  He’s rocking it hard enough to face off with Mad Max.  The big battle sequences are impressive.  And of course, the ending is a gut-punch and a half.  If only the next film didn’t mostly negate what happens at the end of this one.


    I understand why this is frequently named as the best film in the franchise.  I do.  And some of my frustrations aren’t completely fair.  But it isn’t my favorite.  It is a very good movie, and I think more than many of the others, totally watchable by someone who knows nothing about Star Trek.  Actually, the three best films in the franchise are good movies first, and good Trek films second, which I think is only right.  My enduring, but frequently abused hope is that Wrath of Khan’s enduring legacy might one day wane, that some different story archetypes might be used.  Maybe a little problem solving (that doesn’t involve fists) some of those ‘new worlds and new civilizations’ might show up sometime.



-Matt

Matt’s Week in Dork! (4/14/13-4/20/13)



    Sunday morning, Paul, Ben, Brad, and myself went out to see Trance, and more importantly, to eat at Denny’s Baconalia.  Oh, man.  Bacon, maple syrup, and ice cream.  Great combination.  I think it has become a new tradition.  If they do it every year, and I’m not dead, I think we’ll be back.  Otherwise, it was a kind of normal week.  Not much new or different.


    The comic reading spree that started Saturday kept going on Sunday with issue 8 of X-O Manowar.  That’s a thing.  The primary reason I was interested in this series was Cary Nord’s art, and he left the line after like three issues.  The introduction of the character Ninjak pretty much killed it.  Too 90s.


    I don’t fully understand how the Dark Horse Star Wars comics are done.  So when I picked up issue 1 of the five part Fire Carrier miniseries, I didn’t realize it was issue 23 of the Dark Times series.  So there was a bunch of stuff that happened before I didn’t know about, or that it mentions in passing.  Still, the first two issues of this mini are pretty good.  The stuff with young Vader is kind of blah, but I guess they have to bounce back to him occasionally to keep the overall thread of the series.  The stuff with the young Jedi kids and their master at a sinister refugee camp is good though.  Timely.  It has a touch of Nazi Germany, but also of the refugee camps in various warzones of today.


    Having The Avengers come out last year was a trip.  Look, I’m not much of a Marvel fan.  I don’t think very highly of The Avengers.  The few comics I’ve read about them have been ultra-lame.  Still, it was an amazing thing to have such an extremely geeky property get a major, big budget release that didn’t substantially dilute the comic-crazy, and draw tons of box office bank.  As crazy as that was, it absolutely did not prepare me for the announcement that one of the next big Marvel movies was going to be…Guardians of the Galaxy.  What?  That’s crazy.  First, they’re fairly obscure.  Second, they’re the Guardians of the Galaxy.  Rocket Raccoon, man.  Rocket Raccoon.  Anyway, they’ve re-launched a comic and I figured I might as well give it a go.  Issue 0.1 (what is it with comics and their cute numbering systems?) and issue 1.  It’s nothing special so far, but it doesn’t suck.  I prefer my comics cosmic, so I’m more inclined to go for something like this than say X-Men.  I don’t get why Tony Stark is in it.  I haven’t been reading Iron Man (‘cause it sucks), so I don’t know what’s going on there that would make him want to go into space.  Seems odd.  But I’ll keep reading if it doesn’t turn to crap.  Of course, the fact that the last page of issue 1 has them heading back to Earth doesn’t fill me with confidence.  The last place I want cosmic characters (Green Lantern Corps, Silver Surfer, Guardians of the Galaxy, etc.) is on Earth.  That’s sort of like a ninja drinking coffee or a dog trainer watching bowling; odd for a moment, but not something to build a comic series on.



Trance:  “Strawberries.”  I can’t say I really liked this movie, but I was mostly entertained by it.  The last ten minutes or so, I checked out.  I look at it as too many ‘shocking’ reveals, but those I saw it with think it’s one long reveal.  Either way, once it started unraveling, I tuned out.  At least it wasn’t a) all a dream or b) that the two male leads were the same person.  Had it been either of those, I think I’d have screamed.  I like the cast, and it was sooooo nice to see Rosario Dawson in something that didn’t totally suck.  It’s been far, far too long.  She’s an actress I want to like, but she keeps doing the worst films (now, if only Olivia Wilde would make some good choices…).  In a week, I’ll probably only remember how cute (and naked) Dawson was, the film itself being of little consequence.  In fact, only hours later, most of my memories of the film are of her, not the plot or the action.


Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan:  “Buried aliiiiiiiiive!” Like The Motion Picture, there really isn’t much in the way of story here.  They find Khan, he’s angry, they fight, the end.  What elevates it is the design, the performances, and the music.  If you took out any one of those elements, the film would likely have failed.  There are some problems, especially in the light of continuity.  Why are all Khan’s people blonde now?  Why do Khan and Chekov know each other?  Why does nobody think about the whole Ceti Alpha 5 thing before they land?  Still, it’s a fun, action packed film with some great visual elements.  Unfortunately, it’s more action heavy focus would become basis for most subsequent Trek movies, with exploration and problem solving taking a distant back seat.  As it is kind of a re-start, it is also the first in a continuous story that creates a trilogy within the series.


Fraggle Rock Season 2:  “Come on everybody.  Let’s push this greased up monster outta here.”  The stories continue to be just as good through the second season.  This is some of the best youth-aimed entertainment I’ve seen, managing to be profoundly thoughtful and moral, without being preachy or condescending.  If I were ever to have kids, and could let them watch only one show, this would be it.


Star Trek III: The Search for Spock:  “He’s fruity as a nutcake.”  Like The Motion Picture, Star Trek III gets a lot of guff.  The second film in the trilogy within the series, this is about both loss and rebirth.  One could argue that though enraged, Kirk doesn’t get nearly as upset about the loss he suffers in this film as he did with Spock.  But then, how much of a connection did he really have with the person who dies?  And part of me wishes they’d waited, either until the very end of this film, or the next film, to actually find Spock.  There’s really not much of a ‘search’ for him.  It’s more like the opening credits end and ‘oh, hey, there’s Spock.’  I guess ‘Star Trek III: The Stumbling Upon of Spock’ isn’t as catchy a title.  But the movie has a bunch of good character moments, and the emotions in the post climax feel genuine.  The Christopher Lloyd Klingon story is the weakest element of the film, and I think distracts.  They could have had the whole tale be nothing but the investigation into the problems on the Genesis Planet, what was  going on with hyper-aging Spock, and what David had to do with it.  I think the Klingons are a distraction, and sadly kind of cement the Kirk VS. X thing that, with the exception of IV becomes the formula for the rest of the films (replace Kirk with Picard for the Next Gen movies).


Kiss Them for Me:  “I sleep in the raw.”  I love Cary Grant, and this is a funny movie.  But Jayne Mansfield is dreadful.  Grant’s reactions to her…uh, wit(?)…hysterical.  The movie itself is pretty good, it’s tone light, yet dropping in some serious business along the way.  Three buddies (and another kinda friend) go to San Francisco for a four day leave.  Each man has something on his mind.  One is cracking up a bit, one has his sights on political position back home in New England, and one is bitter about it all.  They find romance and fun, drinking and drinking and drinking their way through night and day.  There is a lot of awkward dialog looping, especially from the women which occasionally becomes distracting.  But all in all, it’s a genuinely interesting look back at life near the end of the War (from a decade later), with bits about women workers, injured (physically and psychologically) soldiers, and the like.  You can learn a lot about a time from its entertainment.  Oh, sure, it may not be 100% accurate, but you get a taste of cultural shifts, concerns, attitudes, etc.


Star Wars:  The Clone Wars Season 4:  “I’m not much of a talker.”  The fourth season is not as impressive as the first two, but it’s still got several good episodes.  Again, the show’s major failings are all related the movies, and trying to maintain connections to them.  The lamest characters, the dumbest storylines, the inevitability of stupid plot twists that viewers of Revenge of the Sith already know will largely void various aspects of the series.  The last several episodes of the season do reach some of the highs of the first couple, and I was surprised at how much I enjoyed the reintroduction of a character that should never, ever have come back.  They also did a lot to make the bald villainous chick into a much more interesting character than when she was originally around, working for the Separatists.  Several of the final episodes of the season follow villains about their business, which becomes far more interesting than watching Skywalker be a snotty jackass.


Solaris:  “She’s a bit tricky, but I guess she’s worth while.” This movie takes a lot of flack, because it’s too slow for many viewers and not slow enough for fans of the original Russian version (nor does it feature enough excruciatingly slow zooms into a guy’s ear).  But I really like this meditation on loss, the hunger for connection, and the hope for second chances.  This is Quiet Clooney, so there’s a lot of him sitting, walking, and looking, and not a lot of him talking (see also: The American).  When he is called to a research outpost floating above the planet Solaris, he finds a lot of questions, not many answers, and way, way more than he went there to find.  And then his wife shows up…his dead wife.  Well, that ain’t right.  The film is beautiful, the music hypnotic, and the story thoughtful.  The unfolding of these fractured people’s past is painful, but relatable.  Clooney plays a guy haunted by his past.  Natascha McElhone is that past, a mysterious and challenging woman with a darkness and sadness that consumes.  Don’t go in looking for an action movie.  But if you like drama or quiet science fiction, this is worth checking out.  And no mater what the Criterion cultists say, I still like it better than the Russian version.


Yeelen:  Years ago, I went on something of a quest to find African fantasy films or books (not going into the story behind that right now).  I found little to nothing, and certainly nothing to match what I was looking for.  Well I finally have.  It is an odd tale about a young man on the run from his evil father.  Both are wizards of a sort and do some crazy magic.  The young man has several adventures where his magic helps him win the day.  I know, straight up, that there were large sections of the movie I didn’t get.  But, this is an interesting experience.  And it is a fantasy film based on African magic, which can’t be a common thing.  Did I like it?  It was OK.


    Friday night was the latest graphic novel club meeting hosted by Lisa and Brad.  We had a somewhat spirited discussion of Hawkeye’s first volume.  I was glad to see I wasn’t the only one who wasn’t all fired up about it.  But opinions varied, from those who really enjoyed it to those who hated it.  I’m on the slightly likeier side of middling.  It’s better than a lot of the Marvel stuff on the newsstands right now, but it wouldn’t even be on my radar if not for Brad’s constant evangelism.


Gappa:  “Stupid bird-lizard!”  An expedition to the South Pacific takes a band of scientists to a volcanic island that appears to be the remnant of an ancient civilization.  Yeah, the same one Easter Island was a part of…when all the islands in the Pacific were one…millions of years ago.  You know.  Science.  Those darned primitive descendants of old civilizations sure do love to dance, play drums, and worship volcanoes.  It seems to have been all the rage on lost islands.  There’s not much new here, and it’s obviously not on a technical par with Toho.  The models are kind of cheap and the action clunky.  Still, it’s a perfectly watchable bit of Kaiju fun with plenty of great bad dubbing.  Why do these giant monsters always get along with kids?  I guess kids were the primary target audience, but still.  It’s weird.  I guess this was supposed to spoof the genre, but a spoof of a genera that is already super weird is difficult to pull off.  Maybe I’d get the spoofiness more if I understood the language.


Marquis de Sade’s Justine:  “I spend my days painting.”  My fascination with trash cinema and the enjoyment I’ve recently had of the madman Klaus Kinsky, plus the film’s early production date, prompted me to ignore my Jess Franco Alarm and rent this anyway.  Franco’s early work still has a freshness and enough production value to make watchable, if not good.  And this does appear to have been shot on quality film by a cinematographer who understood how to work the machine (not always true of the director’s work).  It’s not awful.  Frankly, it’s pretty tame considering the topic.  The thing that makes it almost worth the effort of seeking out is Jack Palance.  He’s treating the scenery like a pack of Hubba-Bubba.  It’s kind of amazing, even for Palance.


    On Saturday morning, I finished up Book Four of Saga of the Swamp Thing.  Alan Moore’s run is uneven, but this volume was really good.  It’s a character I think could hold a lot for this reader, if handled by the right writer.  Moore certainly fits the bill, taking the old green monster into some interesting places.


    “Now imagine them with rockets.”  I also read The Rocketeer: Cargo of Doom, which was all kinds of fun.  I love the Rocketeer, and was always bummed Dave Stevens hadn’t done more with the character.  I’m glad to see that people are paying his memory proper respect with a great adventure tale like this one.



    I got a chance to hear the new How to Destroy Angels album this week.  It’s pretty good.  Just on first listen, I like two or three songs right away.  And I don’t think there was anything I didn’t like.  Give me some time with it and we’ll see.  I’ll be curious to see how long this project/band goes on.



-Matt


Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Movie Review: Star Trek The Motion Picture


    People say that there’s some kind of ‘curse of the odds’ thing with Star Trek, where only the even numbered movies are good.  I don’t agree with that.  The Motion Picture gets a lot of flack for being boring, I don’t think that’s the case at all.  It isn’t an action movie, which is something a viewer needs to know from the start.  It is much more the attempt at thoughtful science fiction the show tried (and rarely succeeded) to be.  This is much more in the spirit of 2001 than Star Wars, which is probably one of the reasons it isn’t generally well received.


    The story is, like many of those of the original series, quite simple.  Something big and powerful is heading toward Earth.  Kirk and friends get roped into figuring out what it is and how to stop it.  Spock has lost his spiritual way, and comes back to join Kirk and the rest, looking for something, for a purpose.  That’s basically it.  That’s the so called A plot.  The B plot is about a young captain with a chip on his shoulder, and his alien ex-lover.  In the original show, the crew of the Enterprise came across many godlike beings and many supercomputers.  In some ways, this story is a culmination, or perhaps a distillation, of those episodes.  Elements of Nomad, the Doomsday Machine, the Squire of Gothos among others can all be found.  And then there are the elements that would be carried over into the future.  Obviously, there’s Jerry Goldsmith’s theme which would open Next Gen.  But also, the story of Decker and Ilia would be recreated in Next Gen with Riker and Troi.  It plays out differently, but it’s clearly a dry-run.  There are also elements I think laid some groundwork for what would become the Borg.


    There are problems with the film.  I normally like Stephen Collins, but I don’t like him as Decker at all.  The wormhole sequence is silly and pretty much just waists runtime.  The color scheme is odd, being mostly grey and beige.  And yes, some of the sequences go on for a long, long time.  I don’t mind.  Like 2001, there are extended shots of ships in space, landscapes, etc. with swelling music.  It isn’t action packed.  It takes its time.  I understand why many might not like it, but I’ve come to appreciate these moments of grand exploration.  Once again, taking a page from 2001, this movie is in part about the evolution of humankind, about our children, not individual children, but the children of humanity.  At its heart, the movie is about the nature of being, about the meaning of life, and about the desire to know.


    Like The Cage and Where No Man Has Gone Before, this is a start in a direction I think could have been very interesting.  But it was not to be.  With Wrath of Khan shifted gears as dramatically and definitively as The Man Trap.  Fist fights and space battles would be the name of the game.  Like those original pilot episodes, this feels out of step with the rest of what was to come.  A false start.



-Matt