That's right! According to Joblo.com, action star badass Jason Statham (The Transporter, Crank, Death Race) has been cast as the title character in the upcoming Parker movie based on my beloved Richard Stark novels.
Now, before I even comment about the casting choice I have to comment on the movie's title: Parker. As stated in an earlier post, Parker has never appeared on screen under that name. Stark (aka Donald Westlake) always insisted that the films not use the name unless they were going to do a series. Of course, now that Westlake has shuffled off this mortal coil, his estate doesn't need to bother with such pleasantries. Or could we possibly be seeing further Parker adventures from Statham? I'm guessing that's putting the cart before the horse.
So, do I like Statham for Parker? Hmmmm, sure. As seen in the Crank films and the more recent Mechanic, Statham can play the brute well and that's essential for portraying Parker's cold mentality. I don't think that Statham will have much need for his kungfuery, since when Parker strikes he usually just needs one bullet or a strong pair of mitts.
If anything, what makes me nervous is this write-up in Variety:
"Pic, based on the book series by Donald Westlake, revolves around a thief who, though at times is forced to be a killer, still lives by a code of honor that includes never stealing money from people who need it. His word is his bond, and if he is crossed he will strike back relentlessly."
Um, "code of honor" and "never stealing from people who need it." Ok, sure, Parker does have a personal Code, but they make it sound like he's got a heart of gold or something. That sure as hell ain't the case. His code is that he does as little as possible to get away with the money. He's professional. If he has to kill a kid and bury him in the basement, well, he'll kill a kid and bury him in the basement (and yes, that is something Parker has had to do). He's not honorable and he sure as hell will steal from people who need it.
Also, Taylor Hackford is attached to direct. Love Ranch, Ray, The Devil's Advocate, White Nights, An Officer and a Gentleman. All fine films, but is this the eye I would want behind the first film allowed to use the name Parker? No way.
Another Passage from Variety: "'I don't want to get stuck in a genre,' Hackford told Variety. 'What I like the most about this piece of material is that you can take a genre piece like this and turn it into a great movie.'" Not very inspiring.
Still, I have a huge man-crush on Statham. And, like I said, I do think he can pull off Parker's cold brute force nature. And of course I will get excited for any new film having the slightest to do with the Stark novels.
But, I am concerned. Taylor Hackford is a decent, but uninspired director. And what's the script going to be like? Is Parker another remake of The Hunter? Is it one of the other books: The Score? The Mourner? Butcher's Moon? Or is it some random scriptwriter's idea of Parker? That makes me the most nervous.
--Brad
Like you, I would probably adopt babies with Jason Statham, but all the quotes seriously bother me. Parker flat out hits women and kills people who get in his way. There is no heart of gold, it is a small lump of angry determined coal.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I think Statham could play the role, as long as there is a minimum of talker. Just put people in front of him and let him kill away.
Yeah, the quotes are troubling. Thankfully, early reports like this can be filled with all kinds of not-to-be-trusted quotes. Still, I want a Parker movie written by guys who love the books not the memory of John Boorman's Point Blank.
ReplyDeleteLike Matt with his Conan love, Parker is precious and I don't want people screwing it up especially if they're finally going to be able to use the character's name.